Professional analysis of state power, military operations, intelligence, effects, law, and conflict in and through cyberspace.
24 resources
Build bounded cyber attribution judgments by separating activity clusters, operators, organizations, state relationships, public responsibility, and legal attribution.
Examine how compromised cameras, telecommunications data, geolocation, and digital surveillance can support target development and battle-damage assessment in the 2026 Iran war—without con...
A deep examination of the Iranian drone strikes that damaged AWS facilities in the UAE and Bahrain, their cloud-service effects, military significance, civilian exposure, legal questions, an...
Build defensible cyber campaign concepts by connecting policy aims to behavior, operational functions, effects, authorities, intelligence, risk, assessment, and termination.
Trace cyber effects through shared systems and essential services, identify civilian consequences, and build precautions, monitoring, and stop conditions into operational design.
Govern authorized cyber access as a scarce mission asset through purpose, authority, intelligence gain-loss, OPSEC, safety, deconfliction, and termination decisions.
Design cyber deterrence as a behavior-specific portfolio of denial, resilience, exposure, law enforcement, diplomacy, costs, partnerships, and communication.
Measure whether cyber activity changed systems, missions, behavior, and strategy using causal chains, baselines, counterfactuals, indicators, and independent challenge.
Identify the identities, data, services, control points, providers, and recovery paths whose control creates decisive mission advantage.
Understand how states establish durable access before a crisis, distinguish pre-positioning from espionage, and turn weak signals into proportionate defensive action.
