Incident Responsemethodologies offer structured frameworks that guide organizations through the process of effectively handling and recovering from cyber incidents.
Therefore, here are some top methodologies recognized in cybersecurity for their thorough incident response approaches, highlighting their significance in establishing a robust defense against cyber threats.
Incident Response Methodologies
NIST Cybersecurity Framework
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework is widely regarded for its robust approach to managing and mitigating cybersecurity risk. Furthermore, it outlines five core functions: Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover, which together provide a high-level strategic view of the lifecycle of an organization’s management of cybersecurity risk.
SANS Incident Response Process
The SANS Institute offers a detailed Incident Response Process that is highly respected among cybersecurity professionals. This process emphasizes the importance of preparation, identification, containment, eradication, recovery, and lessons learned.
Many organizations rely on it for its practicality and detailed guidance, making it a go-to option.
ISO/IEC 27035
The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) have developed ISO/IEC 27035, a standard for information security incident management.
Consequently, it offers a structured and planned approach for detecting, reporting, assessing, responding to, and learning from cybersecurity incidents. This ensures that organizations can methodically tackle and improve their response to security threats.
PICERL
PICERL, an acronym for Preparation, Identification, Containment, Eradication, Recovery, and Lessons Learned, is a methodology that offers a sequential approach to incident response.
Furthermore, this methodology is praised for its comprehensiveness, covering every aspect of the incident response process from initial preparation to post-incident analysis.
Cyber Kill Chain
Though not a methodology per se, the Cyber Kill Chain framework, developed by Lockheed Martin, is frequently applied in incident response strategies.
Moreover, it breaks down the structure of a cyberattack into seven stages, offering insights into attacker behavior and tactics. This knowledge is invaluable for developing targeted defenses and responding to incidents effectively.
MITRE ATT&CK Framework
The MITRE ATT&CK Framework is a globally-accessible knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques based on real-world observations.
While primarily aiding in understanding threat behaviors, the MITRE ATT&CK Framework is increasingly becoming integrated into incident response plans. This integration arises from its detailed insights into attacker methodologies, significantly enhancing detection and response strategies.
Dynamic Approach to Incident Response (DAIR)
Adding to the methodologies we’ve discussed, the Dynamic Approach to Incident Response (DAIR) presents a crucial evolution in handling cybersecurity incidents. DAIR recognizes that cyber incidents are complex and unpredictable, often rendering traditional linear response strategies insufficient. Instead of following a strict sequence of steps, DAIR promotes a more flexible, adaptive approach.
Why Have a Process?
When we talk about incident response in cybersecurity, having a structured process is not just beneficial; it’s essential.
You might wonder why sticking to a particular methodology or process is so important.
Let’s outline the key benefits and what it minimizes. This explains why a clear process is vital for managing cybersecurity incidents.
Benefits of Having a Process
Predictability: A structured process makes incident responses predictable. Consequently, team members know their roles, steps to follow, and desired outcomes, thereby cutting response times and boosting cybersecurity effectiveness.
Efficiency: Additionally, a structured process streamlines incident response, optimizing resource use. Consequently, efficiency means achieving more with less time and resources, minimizing the impact of security incidents on operations.
Auditability: Following a predefined process makes tracking actions during incidents simpler. This audit trail aids in post-incident reviews and compliance. Demonstrating a thorough, organized response is vital for meeting regulatory requirements and maintaining trust.
Constant Improvement: A structured approach to incident response inherently supports continuous improvement. Consequently, by reviewing and analyzing the execution of the process and its outcomes, organizations can identify areas for enhancement. This, in turn, allows them to refine their approach, enabling more effective handling of future incidents.
What It Reduces
Indecision: Having a clear process in place reduces hesitation and indecision among team members. When everyone knows their role and the steps to follow, it’s easier to make quick decisions, which is often critical in mitigating the damage caused by cyber incidents.
Uncertainty: A well-defined process dissolves uncertainty. With guidelines and protocols to follow, teams are better equipped to handle the unexpected, even under pressure. This certainty is crucial for maintaining control amid the chaos following a security breach.
Panic: Perhaps one of the most critical aspects of having a structured incident response process is its ability to reduce panic. When a security incident occurs, it’s natural for stress levels to rise. However, a process acts as a calming blueprint that guides actions and decisions, helping to keep panic at bay and ensure a measured, effective response.
Reza Rafati is an experienced cyber security professional. He is the founder of Threat Intelligence Lab. He has extensive experience in the field of cyber threat intelligence, cyber takedowns, and cyber threat landscapes.
